He starts by calling his cameo appearances an eccentricity of his
character which the audience has been tolerant of so far, but might
not be amused any longer. Jokes about directors being granted one
eccentricity per capita. He then gives a twist to the habit
by calling it a devious, sinister ploy on his part to worm
his way into his pictures as a spy. He thinks that a director
should know the other side of the camera, and what it feels like.
He finds this helpful in putting his actors and technicians anticipative
and anxious to shoot him, doing their work much more agilely.
One thing he has learnt is to make the press people subject to their
own devices. "I have a secret yen to interview them, to pose
them for still pictures." And he would like to write a review
of what they write.
"My purpose is, as I have indicated, purely sinister. I find
that the easiest way to worry people is to turn the tables on them."
And he does that by surprising viewers by making innocent,
unsuspected characters the villains. By the extraordinary occurrences
like a murder taking place in the United Nations.
He goes on to describe what he considers to be the chief feature
of best drama that in which common people are shown in routine
situations of life only to be later exposed for the dramatic elements
lurking beneath. He thinks that spy stories of prewar era were just
the stuff that made for such stories ordinary events and people
later turning out to be elements extraordinaire. He thinks that this
kind of spy drama is at an end today, now being shown in other situations.
Finally, the Mcguffin he believes it must adapt to the times.
No more of stolen papers and secret codes. But it is still essential.
The other thing that must change in suspense dramas is their setting.
Trains, subways, towers, must make the way for newer locations. He
mentions shooting a spy story in Alaska.
(The original story appeared in the New York Times.)